Amer Delic vs Joao Souza Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L L L L
Form
W L L W L L W L W WHead-2-Head: Delic 1 - 0 Souza
They have played 2 sets in total, with Delic winning 2 and Souza winning 0. The last match between Delic and Souza was at the Karlsruhe Challenger, 27-05-2009, First, Clay with Amer Delic getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Amer Delic | 1 |
| Joao Souza | 0 |
Karlsruhe Challenger(27-05-2009)
6
3
7
5
| Delic | Stats | Souza |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 60 | Highest Rank | 69 |
| 42 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 18 |
| 55% (272-221) | Career Total W/L | 56% (507-397) |
| $300,634 | Career Prize Money | $261,003 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Amer Delic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Andrew Fitzpatrick
Player
Amer Delic
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
31
Total Points Won
37
|
2-6 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Amer Delic
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
14
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Amer Delic
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Amer Delic
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amer Delic
Player
James Lemke
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Kuznetsov
Player
Amer Delic
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Catalin-Ionut Gard
Player
Amer Delic
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Amer Delic
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amer Delic
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 7-6(16) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Joao Souza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Souza
Player
Mohamed Safwat
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Souza
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
55%
(
55 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
71 of
123)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
123)
120
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Arguello
Player
Joao Souza
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Souza
Player
Gerard Granollers
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Joao Souza
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Joao Souza
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Joao Souza
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
18
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Joao Souza
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (272/221) | Win/Loss | 56% (507/397) |
| 54% (655/555) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1183/942) |
| 51% (6242/6026) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (10772/10024) |
| 55% (148/120) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (70/77) |
| 50% (40/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (435/311) |
| 64% (72/41) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 38% (12/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/5) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1407 | Aces Total | 3594 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 403 | Total Double Faults | 1442 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:6:26 |
| 585.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 621.49 |
| 62% (7966/12795) | 1st Serve % | 62% (27204/43545) |
| 72% (5784/7984) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (19731/27204) |
| 52% (2496/4830) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8508/16348) |
| 38% (359/945) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1562/3980) |
| 35% (4428/12723) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16944/45022) |
| 46% (23/27) | Slam W/L | 24% (9/29) |
| 56% (18/14) | Masters W/L | 22% (4/14) |
| 73% (8/3) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 43% (46/61) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (61/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (169/113) | Challenger W/L | 57% (319/239) |
| 73% (8/3) | Futures W/L | 71% (113/47) |
| 56% (256/459) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (496/881) |
| 48% (15/31) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 54% (156/288) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (194/371) |
| 52% (94/180) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (136/308) |
| 82% (273/225) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (516/424) |
| 17% (273/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (516/92) |
| 21% (220/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (387/81) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
